From Stltoday.com:
By Kevin McDermott 
POST-DISPATCH SPRINGFIELD BUREAU 
Thursday, Jan. 10 2008 
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — Almost two weeks into Illinois' new indoor smoking ban, 
state officials haven't yet cleared the air of lingering questions over how it 
is to be enforced — and what recourse business owners have if they think 
they've been wrongly cited for violations.
The ban remains in effect, as it has since Jan. 1, making it illegal to smoke 
in or near bars, restaurants, casinos and other indoor public venues in 
Illinois. But there are still no detailed enforcement standards for that ban. A 
legislative panel on Wednesday rejected, for the second time, a proposed set of 
specific rules. 
As a result, it remains unclear how outdoor beer gardens are to be policed, 
whether bar owners are responsible for outdoor smoke that drifts inside, and 
whether universities can legally conduct smoking-related research in state 
facilities.
What most concerned lawmakers on the panel Wednesday was that the proposed 
rules provided no internal appeals process for businesses that are fined for 
violating the law.
"The existence of an ashtray (in a restaurant) could trigger an investigation," 
yet there's no way for the restaurant owner to appeal any findings except to 
sue in the court system, said Rep. Lou Lang, D-Skokie, a member of the Joint 
Administrative Committee on Rules.
That legislative committee, which oversees how state laws are implemented by 
state agencies, voted 9-1 against approving rules that were proposed by the 
Illinois Department of Public Health. The agency now will have to revise and 
resubmit its proposed rules to lawmakers, probably next month.
It was the second time in the past two months that the legislative panel 
rejected the agency's proposed rules. Lawmakers expressed frustration at what 
they said was the agency's continued failure to address crucial issues of 
enforcement and due process.
"The one thing I've heard from my constituents is they don't know what their 
rights are," Rep. David Miller, D-Dolton, said at the hearing. 
Miller and others chided Public Health Department officials for their 
insistence that the proposed rules should be implemented immediately, and then 
updated as needed.
"Even though you know there are problems with the rules as written, you want to 
proceed?" Miller asked.
After the hearing, department spokeswoman Melaney Arnold said the agency was 
disappointed at the committee's decision, and that it will put together yet 
another proposed set of rules for lawmakers to consider next month.
"The law still is in place," she added. "As far as smoking in a bar or 
restaurant or bowling alley … that is still against the law."
But within that broad prohibition, there remain numerous detailed questions — 
to the frustration of business owners who are trying to find ways to continue 
to cater to smokers without violating the new law. 
One of them, Fast Eddie's tavern of Alton, has conducted a major renovation to 
install a beer garden to allow patrons to legally smoke on the premises. Owner 
Eddie Sholar said he's confident the facility adheres to the new law as it's 
currently written, but he worries that whatever rules are eventually 
implemented from Springfield may change that.
"They say we have to obey the law, but they can't even tell you what it is. 
Just tell us what it is and we'll do it," Sholar said Wednesday. "It's 
ridiculous how Illinois did this. They don't even know what they're doing."
State officials have received about 300 complaints alleging smoking ban 
violations by businesses since the ban started Jan. 1, said Arnold, the Public 
Health Department spokeswoman. She said she wasn't aware of any fines being 
imposed, and that most violators still were being given warning notices because 
the law is so new.
 
